Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Randel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 12:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page describes a non-existent fictional character. As the character does not exist, this article should be deleted The Clawed One 01:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Overkill, even if he is important to the Yu-gi-oh world, a sentence or two in one of the other article about his deck should suffice. Burzmali 02:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's just it, he isn't important, he doesn't exist at all. The user seems to have confused Wikipedia with Fanfiction.net. The Clawed One 02:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What you're saying is that this is non-canonical character created by someone outside of the originators of Yu-Gi-Oh, right? If so, Speedy Delete as WP:BOLLOCKS or hoax or WP:NFT or whatever. - Richfife 02:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly, the character is non-canon and never existed. The Clawed One 02:35, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What you're saying is that this is non-canonical character created by someone outside of the originators of Yu-Gi-Oh, right? If so, Speedy Delete as WP:BOLLOCKS or hoax or WP:NFT or whatever. - Richfife 02:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's just it, he isn't important, he doesn't exist at all. The user seems to have confused Wikipedia with Fanfiction.net. The Clawed One 02:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Quick research shows no significant hits or any evidence to indicate this character is part of the Yu-Gi-Oh universe. Call it bullshit, call it things made up in school one day, it doesn't belong here.--Ispy1981 03:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Completely non-notable character. --Charlene 12:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if the character was real, the article is horribly written. Erratic Communist 13:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.