Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explosive Pro Wrestling (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:21, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Explosive Pro Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very limited third party sources to the point of a fail in WP:ORG and WP:GNG as previously mentioned in the previous two AfD's" (see also the talk page of the promotion) 2001:8003:5130:2601:167:D2C7:4D20:837E (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Wrestling, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - This has been on rubber legs for a long time and it doesn't look like anything has changed since the last AfD a long time ago from what I can tell. Addicted4517 (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and Salt. The article was deleted twice. Most sources are just Cagematch, not proving notability. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:51, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.