Hillary Clinton and Uranium One

Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration find themselves at the center of an explosive scandal involving the transfer of 20 percent of all U.S. uranium to Russia via the sale of the Uranium One company, just as nine foreign investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation to help grease the wheels.
Here are the seven facts about the Uranium One deal you need to know:

1. Peter Schweizer Broke the Uranium One Scandal
Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President and Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer broke the Uranium One scandal in his book Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich. In the book, he reported that Clinton’s State Department, along with other federal agencies, approved the transfer of 20 percent of all U.S. uranium to Russia and that nine foreign investors in the deal gave $145 million to Hillary and Bill Clinton’s personal charity, the Clinton Foundation.

2. The New York Times Confirmed the Scandal in 2015
The New York Times confirmed Schweizer’s Uranium One revelations in a 4,000-word front-page story by a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter. It detailed how the Russian energy giant Rosatom had taken over the Canadian firm with three separate purchases between 2009 and 2013, largely coinciding with Hillary Clinton’s time as secretary of state.

3. The FBI Uncovered Evidence that Russian Money Was Funneled to the Clinton Foundation
The Hill reported last week that ahead of the deal, the FBI had uncovered “substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering” to expand Russia’s nuclear footprint in the U.S. as early as 2009. The agency also found that Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. to benefit the Clinton Foundation. The Justice Department would sit on the evidence for four years before looking to prosecute, by which time the deal had been approved.

4. Congress Is Now Investigating
The Senate Judiciary Committee has launched a probe into the scandal and has sent requests for more information to 10 federal agencies involved in the approval of the partial sale of Uranium One, asking what they knew about the FBI investigation and when.

5. Bill Clinton Was Paid $500,000 for a Speech in Moscow
Bill Clinton bagged a $500,000 speech in Moscow paid for by a Kremlin-backed bank shortly after Russia announced its intention to take a majority stake in the company. According to the Times, Clinton traveled to Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for its majority stake in Uranium One.

6. The Clinton Foundation Took Big Bucks from Uranium Investors
According to theTimes, The Clinton Foundation received $2.35 million in donations from Ian Telfer, a mining investor who was also the chairman of Uranium One when Rosatom acquired it. It also received $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more from Frank Giustra, the Canadian mining financier whose company merged with Uranium One.

7. Senate Republicans Want an FBI Gag Order Lifted
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has called for the Justice Department to lift the gag order on the FBI’s whistleblower, indicating that he may have more explosive revelations related to the case and on what the Clintons and the Obama administration knew about the case and when they knew it.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/23/7-uranium-one-facts-every-american-should-know/

Jeez. Even you starry-eyed libs have to admit that this shit reeks of pay-to-play. But that's business as usual when it comes to the Clinton Foundation. Not only is this another in the long list of Clinton scandals. This is an Obama admin scandal. Hell, the NY Times confirmed the story so you can't say it's bullshit
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I don't see how this is a scandal. Uranium One is a Canadian company, why are a bunch of snow sucking Canuck motherfuckers mining U.S. uranium in the first fucking place? Uranium One Founded in 2005. Looks like George W. Bush scandal, if anything more than a shit doughnut.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Make sure to keep us updated on where Breitbart is with this. Make sure you check in on the site many times a day. And don't be a slacker about this. Read through all the headlines and articles to make sure that no stone is left unturned. We will need frequent updates on this.
 
Let's not forget eight other entities besides Dept of State, AND the nuclear regulatory commission, all independently approved this deal.
Man o man those Clintons really have some kinda mystical powers to influence everybody.
Maybe it's the voodoo shit they learned about on their honeymoon?
 
Make sure to keep us updated on where Breitbart is with this. Make sure you check in on the site many times a day. And don't be a slacker about this. Read through all the headlines and articles to make sure that no stone is left unturned. We will need frequent updates on this.

Will do. The Senate Judiciary Comm has launched an investigation so there's plenty more to come. This is just the beginning. Dems will be going to jail.

$20
 
Make sure to keep us updated on where Breitbart is with this. Make sure you check in on the site many times a day. And don't be a slacker about this. Read through all the headlines and articles to make sure that no stone is left unturned. We will need frequent updates on this.

Roger that.

( just a little military jargon, soldier)

:1orglaugh
 
I don't see how this is a scandal. Uranium One is a Canadian company, why are a bunch of snow sucking Canuck motherfuckers mining U.S. uranium in the first fucking place? Uranium One Founded in 2005. Looks like George W. Bush scandal, if anything more than a shit doughnut.

Stinks of a CIA front company.
This kind of shit is Bush family all day long and I have long said that the Clintons are CIA assets for a long time.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Now you're knockin' people who wear glasses? And you wonder why everyone hates you?

Those BCG wearers did something you never had the balls to do. Serve.
 

Mayhem

Banned
‘It appears they don’t know I’m not president’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...know-im-not-president/?utm_term=.d060e6297449

Hillary Clinton was nowhere near Washington the day charges against President Trump's former campaign chairman were announced and news broke that a former Trump campaign volunteer had pleaded guilty to lying to federal agents about meeting with Russian officials.

She was in Chicago where she promoted her book (“I have a great chapter about Russia”), thought about her Halloween costume (“I think I will maybe come as the president”) and quipped about conservative media outlets’ preoccupation with a vanquished presidential candidate while big news surrounded the one who won.

“All the networks except Fox are reporting what’s really going on... It appears they don't know I’m not president,” tweeted NBC News politics reporter Alex Seitz-Wald, quoting Clinton, who held an event at the Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University on Monday night.

Conservative media outlets seem to have largely followed White House talking points in reporting the news dump of the past few days: There’s no collusion. The charges against Paul Manafort predates his involvement in the Trump campaign. George Papadopoulos was a lowly campaign volunteer. And the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee’s funding of research that resulted in the now-infamous dossier — not to mention the Uranium One deal with a Russian company that was approved during the Obama administration while Clinton was secretary of state — are the clearest evidence of collusion with Russia.

For the Clinton camp, it seems there's a fixation on an administration that does not exist.

“If you watch Fox News these days, they're treating Hillary Clinton as if she won the election,” said former Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon, calling the media outlet the White House’s “propaganda arm” that focuses on Clinton while downplaying the recent criminal allegations arising from special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation into possible Russian influence in the presidential election. “Fox News is certainly buying that alternative narrative and they’re trying to peddle it, but Bob Mueller is not going to fall for that.”

Fox News did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The media outlet also had aired segments that included references to the nonexistent “Clinton administration” and “President Clinton.”

“The speculation is so insane right now. What we should be focusing on are the continued lies of the Clinton administration, the continued fallacies that they perpetuate,” former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said on Fox News’s “Fox & Friends” on Saturday, as news of an indictment loomed over Washington.

And here’s Sean Hannity, one of the leading purveyors of White House talking points, in his Monday night monologue, which focused on Clinton, the uranium deal and the dossier:

“What did Hil — what did President Clinton, uh or, President Clinton wannabe, President Obama and key members of the Obama administration, what did they know about the Uranium One scandal?”

The Clinton coverage continued to dominate in the conservative media world Monday morning, even as news broke that Manafort and his former business associate Rick Gates were told to surrender to the FBI. White House counselor Kellyanne Conway appeared on “Fox & Friends,” saying the focus should be on Clinton.

“People should be looking into any coordination . . . between the Clinton campaign, the DNC, the Russian dossier,” Conway said, adding that she and others in the administration would love to not talk about Clinton, “but she just won’t go away.”

“Fox & Friends” echoed Conway a bit later that morning with the headline, “PROBE SHOWS DEM TIES TO URANIUM DEAL, DOSSIER,” as other national media outlets focused their coverage on Manafort.

News of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee’s role in funding research that led to the dossier, first reported by The Washington Post last week, has become a major weapon for the White House and conservative media, which sought to focus allegations of collusion on Clinton, her campaign and the Democrats.

“There is clear evidence of the Clinton campaign colluding to smear the president and influence the election,” White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said during the White House briefing Monday.

So has the Uranium One deal that’s now the subject of a congressional probe.

Fallon, the former Clinton campaign spokesman, dismissed the new investigation as an effort by congressional Republicans to try to “dig up scandals” on someone who’s never going to seek elected office again.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that Clinton was “paid a fortune” when she was secretary of state in exchange for a deal with a Russian state-owned nuclear energy company to control over 20 percent of the U.S. uranium supply. But multiple fact checks have shown that there is no evidence that Clinton was personally involved in the deal, which was approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Treasury Department’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, none of which involved Clinton.

As the Fact Checker’s Glenn Kessler wrote: “Any suggestion that Russian money was directed to influence Clinton’s decisions would be explosive. But the fatal flaw in this allegation is Hillary Clinton, by all accounts, did not participate in any discussions regarding the Uranium One sale which — as we noted — does not actually result in the removal of uranium in the United States.”

Cable news headlines remained just as disparate in the Monday evening broadcasts:

CNN: “FIRST CHARGES FILED IN MUELLER INVESTIGATION”

MSNBC: “REPORT: FIRST CHARGES FILED IN MUELLER RUSSIA PROBE”

Fox News, promoting a Hannity special: “NEW DETAILS IN DEMOCRAT SCANDALS”

The New York Post — which, along with Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, is also owned by Rupert Murdoch — had nearly dropped the story of the indictments from its homepage by Monday evening, focusing instead on sexual harassment scandals related to Kevin Spacey, Peyton Manning and Harvey Weinstein.

Breitbart’s lead story was about Tony Podesta, a prominent Democratic lobbyist and brother of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chief.

“THE PLOT THICKENS,” reads a Breitbart headline. “TONY PODESTA RESIGNS FROM PODESTA GROUP AS MUELLER PROBE HEATS UP.”

Podesta, brother of John Podesta, had not been charged with a crime or named in court filings, though his firm was indirectly referenced in the charges against Manafort and Gates.

On Tuesday morning, an alert splashed across the Fox News website read: “No Russia collusion, but are more Mueller charges coming? Should Hillary worry?”

By Tuesday afternoon, Breitbart’s lead story was a rehash of Fox News’s Laura Ingraham’s interview with Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who urged the Justice Department to contain intelligence leaks.

On the Daily Caller’s homepage, the main story was also about Podesta: “We Asked This Dem Senator About The Podesta Group. He Immediately Tried to Deflect.” Below that was a story about White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly’s interview with Fox News’s Ingraham. Ingraham asked if there should be another special prosecutor to investigate the Uranium One deal, to which Kelly said, “Yeah, I guess so.”

The New York Post, meanwhile, has completely dropped any news story about the Mueller investigation or the indictment from its homepage.
 
No Cletus, we have absolutely nothing in common. In any instance.

Sure we do Tiny, we both never served in the military. You aren’t liked very well either.
Of course in education, and intellect, you can’t hold a candle to me, so in that respect, the things that matter we share nothing in common.
 

Mayhem

Banned
No Cletus, you're the only coward in this conversation. And for a guy who goes on and on about education and intellect, it would be nice if you'd demonstrate it once in a while. :rofl2:
 

Mayhem

Banned
On the Worst Day of His Presidency, Donald Trump Spent the Day Fuming at His TV

https://www.gq.com/story/donald-trump-worst-day-of-his-presidency

Monday, October 30, 2017 was far and away the worst day of Donald Trump's presidency. What was supposed to be the start of a week that saw Republicans rally to the cause of pushing through tax reform instead became a parade of horribles for the president. A federal judge struck down part of his ban on transgender people serving in the military. His approval ratings hit a new low, which is saying something because they already are pretty subterranean. And, oh yeah, his former campaign manager was indicted, and it was revealed that a former aide (George Papadopoulos) has pleaded guilty to lying to investigators in their probe about Russian collusion, and is now cooperating with the investigation. So yeah, even in an administration that has made having shitty days an art form, this one was particularly shitty. And how did our Glorious Leader respond? I know you'll find this shocking, but not well.
According to a report from The Washington Post, Donald Trump spent much of his Monday watching TV and, well, not having a very good time.

Separated from most of his West Wing staff — who fretted over why he was late getting to the Oval Office —
Trump clicked on the television and spent the morning playing fuming media critic, legal analyst and crisis communications strategist,
according to several people close to him.
The president digested the news of the first indictments in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe with exasperation and disgust,
these people said. He called his lawyers repeatedly. He listened intently to cable news commentary. And, with rising irritation, he watched
live footage of his onetime campaign adviser and confidant, Paul Manafort, turning himself in to the FBI.


All day Monday, the Trump White House repeatedly and constantly tried to make the point that these indictments had nothing to do with President Trump. The public message (a.k.a. what was said on Fox News as though it were true) was that this was a big "nothingburger." (These public defenses also seemed to try their best to pretend they'd never heard of Papadopoulos.) But privately Trump aides were singing a different tune. A way less confident tune. In fact, it sounds like many are terrified of what's to come next.

Away from the podium, Trump staffers fretted privately over whether Manafort or Gates might share with Mueller’s team
damaging information about other colleagues. They expressed concern in particular about Gates because he has a young
family, may be more stretched financially than Manafort, and continued to be involved in Trump’s political operation and had
access to the White House, including attending West Wing meetings after Trump was sworn in.


If you're keeping track, of the three criminal cases we learned of yesterday, at least two have the potential to be horribly damaging to Donald Trump, and the third one was his former campaign manger. So yeah, I feel pretty confident saying that it was a pretty bad day for the administration.
 
Top