Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cylon Resurrection ship
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete & redirect. ChetblongT C 01:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cylon Resurrection ship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:FICT. No assertion of real-world significance, in-universe information only. The ship was only featured in a couple of episodes, and those episodes have their own article. No sources, no apparent importance. I would oppose a merge because the episode articles should have more real-world perspective rather than less. Mangojuicetalk 16:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. If it's only been referenced in a handful of episodes, and those episodes have their own articles, information on this starship should be incorporated there.Hazillow (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Resurrection Ship. No evidence that this is notable outside a single pair of episodes. It would be good if the Resurrection Ship article included information about the ship's conceptual history, but this is just plot summary and not worth merging. A single sentence in the episode article along the lines of "A resurrection ship later reappeared in the episode 'Collaborators'" would be acceptable. EALacey (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Resurrection Ship. --Explodicle (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 (talk) 00:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.