BREAKING: Ruth Bader Ginsburg hospitalized

His handlers will be, at least. I doubt trump himself understands the significance of supreme court appointments, he just knows he gets a cookie and mitch isn't mean to him when he gets one.
 

Little Red Wagon Repairman

Posts With Autopen
https://www.yahoo.com/news/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-has-died-supreme-court-says-234042604.html

Sad to here this. I will bet The Donald is dancing about the White House.

Ding-DONG...

tenor.gif


source.gif
 
He won't be flossing for long, apparently there are a few republican senators left with principles, and enough have already said they won't vote to confirm before the election that it's looking pretty unlikely. Of course, even if trump loses the election, and ignoring the shitstorm of legal battles that will follow, there's the whole lame duck session to get through, and the rare republican senators who have shown a bit of spine don't generally show it for long.

I'm sure this is just another thing the trumpers of the board will ignore and refuse to address, but there's no way you can justify blocking Garland 9 months out from the election and try to smash through your guy less than 2 months before the election. It's just not possible without admitting that you're full of shit, and so are your senators, and you don't care, because they're republicans.

On top of that, contributions to Biden and Amy McGrath have gone through the roof in the last few hours. I guess this has got a few people freaking out.
 
Mitch McConnell says Senate will take up nominee to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg
https://nypost.com/2020/09/18/senat...will-take-up-nominee-to-replace-rbg-mcconnell

What are your thoughts on this georges? Try something beyond copying links and clicking the turd button. Do you think it's fine that mcconnell refused to vote on Garland and left a seat on the supreme court open for more than a year, and now has vowed to try to confirm a trump nominee with less than 46 days until the election, georges? Remember, georges, in 2016, mcconnell said this - The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice, therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president

Do you think that that's ethical, moral, or fair, georges? Or do you think congressional leaders should remain consistent in their application of rules, georges? Come on georges, try to contribute something more than just turds.
 
Just bumping this back up, seems like georges is done with his flood of pointless, inane bullshit, and we can get the actual conversation back on track.
 
This is the moment when we're gonna know if the democratic party does have a back bone. Are they gonna fight to the teeth to prevent Trump from filling her seat before the election or are they gonna let him having it his way ?
I'm not very optimistic...
 
What are your thoughts on this georges? Try something beyond copying links and clicking the turd button. Do you think it's fine that mcconnell refused to vote on Garland and left a seat on the supreme court open for more than a year, and now has vowed to try to confirm a trump nominee with less than 46 days until the election, georges? Remember, georges, in 2016, mcconnell said this - The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice, therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president

Do you think that that's ethical, moral, or fair, georges? Or do you think congressional leaders should remain consistent in their application of rules, georges? Come on georges, try to contribute something more than just turds.
Just bumping this back up, seems like georges is done with his flood of pointless, inane bullshit, and we can get the actual conversation back on track.
Please keep your comments for yourself. Ruth Bader Ginsburg waw a brave woman, had a great carreer and she fought till her last breath. However she was clearly an Obama appointed judge, so the less there is a democrat appointed SCOTUS judges, the better it is. I am glad that Trump will fill that position with a conservative person. Because Obamagate or Muppetogate and the endless and useless trials made against Trump as well as all the bs spillt by the mainstream medias just added nothing constructive from the Democrat side but just millions of dollars spent away with the tax payers money. The congress is filled of clowns like crying Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Occasio Cortez, Jerry Nadler and all the rest of the brady bunch of leftists and Obama minions that are just nocive and destructive for America's interests.
Maybe you should remember what Democrats said about filling a Supreme Court Vacancy In 2016
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/18/...spid=heNtu.JABlSN47y7GwvghDYwLxHrmCWI8pIOP2Ro
 
Maybe you should remember what Democrats said about filling a Supreme Court Vacancy In 2016
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/18/...spid=heNtu.JABlSN47y7GwvghDYwLxHrmCWI8pIOP2Ro

Deciding in advance simply to turn your back before the president even names a nominee is not an option the Constitution leaves open.
Well, apparently, Moscow Mitch decided it actually is an option the constitution leaves open.

Elections have consequences
Moscow Mitch refused to accept the conququences of the 2012 election, why would Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi should accept the consequences of the 2016 election ?

In 2016, Moscow Mitch pretended to act on principles but now he's about to give up these principles for political gain. why should the democrats have to stand by their principles ?
Why should only Republicans be allowed to play dirty while Democrats should be required to play nice ?
 
Please keep your comments for yourself. Ruth Bader Ginsburg waw a brave woman, had a great carreer and she fought till her last breath. However she was clearly an Obama appointed judge, so the less there is a democrat appointed SCOTUS judges, the better it is. I am glad that Trump will fill that position with a conservative person. Because Obamagate or Muppetogate and the endless and useless trials made against Trump as well as all the bs spillt by the mainstream medias just added nothing constructive from the Democrat side but just millions of dollars spent away with the tax payers money. The congress is filled of clowns like crying Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Occasio Cortez, Jerry Nadler and all the rest of the brady bunch of leftists and Obama minions that are just nocive and destructive for America's interests.
Maybe you should remember what Democrats said about filling a Supreme Court Vacancy In 2016
https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/18/...spid=heNtu.JABlSN47y7GwvghDYwLxHrmCWI8pIOP2Ro
Never remind them of there own words and positions they just start name-calling "racist zenophobe womanizer blah blah don't tell me what I said blah blah blah" it's like they don't know that words mean things. Bubutbut that time was different waaah :ROFLMAO:
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
Never remind them of there own words and positions they just start name-calling "racist zenophobe womanizer blah blah don't tell me what I said blah blah blah" it's like they don't know that words mean things. Bubutbut that time was different waaah :ROFLMAO:

 
Deciding in advance simply to turn your back before the president even names a nominee is not an option the Constitution leaves open.
Well, apparently, Moscow Mitch decided it actually is an option the constitution leaves open.

Elections have consequences
Moscow Mitch refused to accept the conququences of the 2012 election, why would Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi should accept the consequences of the 2016 election ?

In 2016, Moscow Mitch pretended to act on principles but now he's about to give up these principles for political gain. why should the democrats have to stand by their principles ?
Why should only Republicans be allowed to play dirty while Democrats should be required to play nice ?
Because both Crying Chuck and Crazy Nancy are both involved in the Obamagate so by default, they haven't been acting nice since day one but nothing aside obstruct, resist, whine moan and perhaps constantly bitch about Clinton's loss. Name me one non biased Democrat since Obama's presidency ended? I don't think there is any.

Trump promises to nominate a new Supreme Court Justice ‘without delay’

https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/19/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

ABC: Trump to nominate RBG successor in 'coming days'
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/se...=DM147223_09192020&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010502rkorm1
 
Last edited:
Because both Crying Chuck and Crazy Nancy are both involved in the Obamagate so by default, they haven't been acting nice since day one but nothing aside obstruct, resist, whine moan and perhaps constantly bitch about Clinton's loss. Name me one non biased Democrat since Obama's presidency ended? I don't think there is any.
1) ObamaGate is myth
2) Moaning and obstructing is exactly what Moscow Mitch, Paul Ryan and John Boenher did during Obama's presidency
3) Name me one none-biased Republican during Obama's presidency. Name me one non biased Republican since Obama's presidency ended. It's politics man, everyone's biased in favor of their own party and against the opposite party.
 

gmase

Nattering Nabob of Negativism
RBG was nominated by Bill Clinton and confirmed with a 96-3 vote.

The vote counting will be interesting. McConnell has 53 Rs in the Senate and needs 50 plus Pence. He'll have that until when? Arizona is holding an election for the final two years of McCain's term. The winner (Kelly), if it is not McSally, could assume office in late November. That would reduce his count to 52. If it is McSally, the 53 stays in place in the next Congress begins in January.

If Trump and the party is so confident of victory, why the haste?
 
Top